05 / FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
105HICL ANNUAL REPORT 2022
05 / FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Key audit matters: our assessment of risks of material misstatement
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements and
include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by us, including those which had the
greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the aud t; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. We
summarise below the key aud t matter (unchanged from 2021), in arriving at our audit opinion above, together with our key aud t procedures to
address this matter and, as required for public interest entities, our results from those procedures.
These matters were addressed, and our results
are based on procedures undertaken, in the context of, and solely for the purpose of, our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in
forming our opinion thereon, and consequently are incidental to that opinion, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter.
The risk Our response
Valuation of investment in
investment entity subsidiary
(£3,158.5m; 2021: £2,950.3m)
Refer to:
Audit Committee Report on page
87
Accounting policy on pages 115
Financial disclosures on pages 120
and 121
Forecast based valuation:
— The Company’s investments in ts
immediate subsidiary is carried at
fair value through profit or loss and
represents a significant proportion
of the Company’s net assets. The
fair value of the immediate
subsidiary reflects its net asset
value incorporating the fair value
of the underlying infrastructure
projects and holding companies.
— The fair value of infrastructure
investments is determined using
the income approach whereby the
long term forecasted cash flows of
each individual infrastructure asset
are discounted, with their
cashflows and/ or discount rate
adjusted to reflect risk profile
associated w th these
investments. In addition, inherent
in these long term forecasted cash
flows are key macro-economic
assumptions such as inflation,
foreign exchange rates, tax rates,
deposit rates and (for certain
demand-based investments) GDP.
— The valuation risk represents a risk
of error associated with estimating
the timing and amounts of long
term forecasted cash flows and a
risk of both fraud and error
associated w th the selection and
application of discount rates,
appropriate macro-economic
assumptions and specific project
adjustments to reflect risk.
Changes to long term forecasted
cash flows and/or the selection
and application of different
assumptions may result in a
materially d fferent valuation for
the infrastructure investments.
— In the current year the macro-
economic assumptions impacting
all investments and spec fically the
forecasted cash flows of demand
based investments continue to be
impacted by the economic
disruption caused by COVID-19
and broader geopol tical and
economic factors. This results in a
high degree of estimation
uncertainty, with a potential range
of reasonable outcomes greater
than our materiality for the
financial statements as a whole
and poss bly many times that
amount. The financial statements
(note 14) disclose the sensitivity
estimated by the Company.
Our procedures included:
— Assessing forecasted distributions: we have compared the
prior year forecasts to current year actual distributions to
consider historical accuracy of forecasting. We assessed the
valuation for each investment focusing on changes since the
prior reporting date. We risk-assessed the portfolio, selecting
specific investments to perform additional procedures on.
This sample included specific investments where there has
been a significant movement in valuation, investments w th
known operational issues and a haphazard selection of
investments from the residual population.
— considered whether the cash flows used for the
calculation are consistent with the forecasts prepared by
the underlying investments and assessed responses from
underlying project entities to identify significant matters
identified for the projects and whether these have a
material impact on the forecasted distributions;
— held discussions with the investment manager to ident fy
any specific operational issues relating to the
investments, and assessed and challenged the impact of
these issues on the forecasted distr butions and discount
rate;
— gained an understanding of and challenged any significant
adjustments, e ther to the cash flows and/ or discount
rates, that impact forecasted distributions, including
adjustments related to COVID-19; and
— tested evidence to support all significant acquisitions and
disposal during the year.
— Benchmarking valuation assumptions: w th support from
KPMG valuation specialists, we reviewed and challenged the
Company’s assumed discount rates and the macro-economic
assumptions applied in the valuation models by benchmarking
against independent market data, market transactions and
valuation specialists’ experience in valuing similar
investments.
— We considered the impact on discount rates and macro-
economic assumptions in light of COVID-19 and ts impact on
demand based assets. We reviewed the methodology used
and with input from the valuation specialists assessed the
reasonableness of this methodology and assumptions
applied;
— Evaluation of the third party expert: we assessed the
objectiv ty, capabilities and competence of the third party
valuation expert engaged by the Company to challenge the
reasonableness of the Company’s investment valuations. We
considered the methodology applied by the valuation expert
in performing their work. We obtained and assessed the
valuation expert’s findings, held discussions with them and
considered the impact, if any, on our aud t work; and
— Assessing disclosures: we considered the Company’s
disclosures in relation to the use of estimations and
judgements regarding the fair value of investments and the
Company’s investment valuation policies. Additionally we
assessed the transparency provided by the disclosures w th
regards to outlining sens tiv ties in investment values in
relation to economic assumptions applied.
Our results
— As a result of our work we found the valuation of the investment
in investment entity subsidiary and related sensitivity disclosures
to be acceptable. (2021: Acceptable)